In Bruges (2008) is one of those films that everyone, both
twitter and real life friends, kept telling me to see but I never got
around to. I finally saw it this week, in my Existential Literature
class of all places and I now know why it got all the hype it did.
|
"Maybe that's what Hell is: the entire rest of eternity stuck in fucking Bruges."- Ray |
First of all the cast is amazing. Half of the
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
cast is in the film so right there is a good indication of the caliber
of actor in this film. Brendan Gleeson and Colin Farrell are amazing in
their roles as hit men with hearts. Since I watched both of the films in
the same day, I can compare them and
In Bruges has the character depth that
Children of Men
completely lacked. Gleeson and Farrell are so flawed and at the same
time so real. They are also immensely likeable men. Ralph Fiennes is
also pure evil as always, as Harry the hitman with a code of ethics.
The
setting was amazing. The opening with its long sweeping shots of the
cathedrals and canals really helped to establish the tone of the film
and added a fluid movement that ran throughout the film. The slow
establishing shots of the setting contrasted well with the quick action
shots that came later on.
I think the thing I liked most about
In Bruges was the emotional force that it brought.
It was one of those films that made you laugh and then cry only moments
later. It was both hysterically funny and deeply emotional and it is so
rare that films can pull both those emotions off well. Since I watched
it for class we spent a lot of time discussing the deeper themes and the
issues of morality and choices that occur throughout the film. It did really make one think.
There
was really very little I disliked about the film. It was worth the hype
that everyone attributed to it. Everything from the music to script was
spot on and everything was made better by the
Review: No milk required
No comments:
Post a Comment